There are 2 schools of thoughts on the sources of social change: elite split/top-down or bottom-up. Where the urban elites are clearly split in Sarawak, the rural majority (at least where the majority seats are) is left fending for themselves in a situation where the ruling parties remain the only tune in town. Blaming the rural folks for `addicting’ to that `old records’ may have missed the point: where are the alternatives? Unless the rural folks are empowered to derive their own strength to assert themselves they remain chained to the manipulation from the top. Should there be pity the urban folks who don’t see their interests in giving the rural folks a helping hand-even out of self-interests? The source of the problems seems mis-located often enough…
Why rural S’wakians keep voting ‘feudal’ Taib
By Joseph Tawie
KUCHING: Chief Minister Taib Mahmud runs a ‘repressive’ government, one that is ‘worse than the communist’, says a local activist. Yet the rural people of Sarawak continue to vote him in. Why is that?



