Another leadership tussle in PKR-this time over the position of the Sarawak Chief position-which is only a month after a re-appointment after the party poll, and within 6 month of a state election. The public who are supporters of the party would be excused to feel disappointed at such power struggle which happened behind the party’s closed doors.Who ever it is who may emerge as the winner the loser is the party because the power struggle at this juncture make little sense to the people outside. Why is the party keep making people feel that it is shooting itself in the foot? There is a view which look at human behaviour from a `system’ perspective. The point of a good system is not to stop power struggles-but to channel it to the party and the public’s benefits.
When leadership struggles happen there are many reasons-chief of which is that there are people who are dissatisfied at the present leadership. Challenging the leadership is not the only way to deal with it-it is the end of a process to debate about the issues concerned. The debate is concluded by a vote of confidence on the incumbent. That is what it should be if democracy is the only game in town. However just like the BN parties especially UMNO, the top leader of PKR actually personally choose the state chief and the major appointed position holders, along with the candidates for parliament, state and, if there are council elections, also council candidates! Practically the top leader need to know thousands of people well enough to make these important appointments on a well-considered basis. If not then the top leader will have to depend on a lot of his trusted lieutenants/`lobbyists’ to provide the information he needs on the candidates-jumping over the local members who may know much better than the top leader and his lieutenants on who make a better leader/candidate in their respective area!
So under current top-leader’s monopoly of appointment power the winner, including the incumbent’ is suspected of being the favourite of the top leader and not the state membership. So the arena for leadership struggle is not the state party election, but the campaign/lobbies to the top leader-by SMS’es or any other means. The local membership at large are kept in the dark in a party that officially champion democracy.
Looking at the numerous failures in making good choices viz the prevalence of froggy leaders in the party, it is advisable for PKR to start the democratisation from within the party-starting by devolving the over-concentrated power of appointment of the top leader! Then may be there will be less leadership tussles in various states where state elections will decide conclusively who have the confidence and mandate of the state members. Look like the party need to go further than merely holding direct elections on the top posts to reach the distant destination of `democracy-polis’. BN’s rule by the party chief’s dictate does not work in BN-neither does it work in PR when transplanted. As real examples of alternative /more democratic operation: there are countries/parties where the local candidates/chiefs are chosen by primary elections in the respective constituencies-and the winners cannot be changed even by the top leaders or anyone else!
January 8, 2011
Anwar in quandary over Baru Bian’s post
PKR leader Anwar Ibrahim is being subjected to a “fierce SMS campaign” urging him to remove national PKR vice-president Baru Bian as state party chief, according to sources close to the party.
Over the past week, there has been intense lobbying for Granda Aing, state PKR vice-chairman, to replace Baru Bian, a well-known land rights lawyer, as Sarawak PKR chief.
Having helmed the Sarawak PKR liaison committee for a little over a year, Baru Bian has a number of party rivals working against him despite making some headway in the campaign against the ruling BN coalition.
“Within the short period of time, Baru has raised the standard on the challenge mounted against the state BN,” said a political scientist who follows Sarawak politics closely.
“No wonder the Sarawak chief minister, and BN at the national level, are working even harder in their desperate attempt to retain Sarawak in the upcoming state election.”
According to a party leader, the PKR political bureau met last night ostensibly to confirm Baru Bian as state PKR chief, but the SMS drive appears to have thrown the appointment into doubt. There will be another meeting tomorrow.
“It seems like Anwar is still in two minds,” said the political observer.
“Anwar’s main political weakness is that he is still living in the old PKR trying to be inclusive in the appointment of leaders and selection of candidates,” he said, referring to how the relatively unknown Granda Aing is even being considered.
“Anwar has obviously not learned to accept the ground realities.”
The two leaders in Sarawak PKR have separate approaches to state politics.
Baru Bian has put emphasis on the native customary rights (NCR) to land and linking such rights to the broader rights of Sarawakians, a pressing issue among all ethnic groups: Dayak, Malay and Chinese.
He has also won several celebrated court cases on behalf of rural NCR landowners against the state government and its favoured logging and oil palm plantation companies.
“Baru Bian has the image of not just being a humble man and a justice-minded politician but his integrity has broad base appeal among the public.”
The political observer was referring to Baru’s high-profile land rights cases which cut across racial boundaries, including a landmark victory for Mohd Rambli Kawi, whose Malay land rights were also illegally infringed by the state BN government.
Granda lacks public appeal
Meanwhile, Granda, a Bidayuh from Bau, has spoken out strongly for his own community, but he does not have the same public appeal throughout the state.
He had weighted into an internal BN debate over the non-appointment of Bidayuh as chairman of the Padawan Municipal Council, without realising that he was drawn into the divisive polemic of racial politics.
“Coming from a PKR vice-chairman, a party professing to be non-racial, it just shows how BN-type of people are very much alive and kicking in PKR,” observed a Sarawakian blogger who criticised Granda in the popular Sarawak blog ‘Hornbill Unleashed’.
“If Anwar picks Granda over Baru, then Anwar is doomed to repeat his destructive path and Sarawak will continue to be under the corrupt BN for another 50 years,” said the blogger.
“Baru is the obvious leader to take on Sarawak’s ruling BN,” said the political analyst.
“He has spearheaded a PKR campaign that gained much momentum in Sarawak, especially by making use of all alternative information to great effect, such as the Sarawak Report and Radio Free Sarawak, which have disseminated reports of alleged wealth and land grabs by Chief Minister Abdul Taib Mahmud.”
The PKR under Baru Bian has overseen the distribution of tens of thousands of pamphlets and VCDs containing information form theSarawak Report, which have made the BN extremely edgy, as attested to by yesterday’s arrests of Dayak activists in possession of these compact discs.
“The BN has reacted in a big way, and I dare say the spread of information has thrown Taib’s leadership into doubt, with reports of (premier) Najib Razak wanting Taib to step down,” the political observer said.
“Baru’s public record over the last two decades has gained him many friends, locally and abroad, and from non-partisan Sarawakian groups who have now turned Pakatan-friendly,” he said.
“The fact that Anwar’s choice of leader can determine how Sarawak will perform in the upcoming state election speaks volume of the sense of helplessness that Sarawakians must feel, especially after almost 50 years of BN.”


Semua,
Anwar sudah jadi gila. Don’t trust him in everything anymore. Better for all PKR members to jump to SNAP in order for us to contnuosly fight for Sarawak rights. Selagi PKR is under Anwar, kita tak boleh menang sampai bila bila masa menentang BN. JANGAN IKUT PARTY PKR lagi………..
FOR YOUR INFORMATION
UPDATE ON SOUTHERN SUDAN INDEPENDENCE REFERENDUM
Let us pause for a moment on the internal tussles of PKR and reflect on the independence referendum now in progress in Southern Sudan.
Update
Issues
The above video link also gives you links to the background and issues confronting Southern Sudan.
They are issues similar to those Sarawak faces being in “Malaysia”.
OIL is one of the central issues leading to the Southern Sudan Independence Referendum.
Oil is also a BIG issue in Sarawak which lost control of this great wealth totally to Malayan control with “independence in Malaysia” in 1963.
It has been estimated that between 1963 and 2010 more than $1000 billion worth of oil and gas has been pumped out of Sarawak by Petronas to finance Malaya and prime the pockets of UMNO BN and cronies. (The figure may have to be revised when the proper figures are disclosed).
In 2007 Petronas ranked as the No. 8 most profitable corporation in the world
The rest of Sarawak oil profits are taken by multinationals like the Royal Dutch Shell Company (http://royaldutchshellplc.com/ ) and US EXXON.
Sarawak gets very little in return and has become one of the poorest “states” after 48 years of independence in Malaysia!.
Recently we were betrayed and sold out by Kuala Lumpur which gave away 2 blocks of Sarawak offshore oilfields to Brunei.
If money was transacted where did the money go? Or were the oilfields given away free?
How is it that we end up losing control of our wealth to another country when we are “independent” and have the benefit of our national assets?
Don’t forget we were a semi-independent state before 1941 when we first lost our independence to Japanese invasion, then the British takeover in 1946 followed by transfer as a colony to Malayan control in 1963.
We call on Sarawakians to think about an independence referendum as a peaceful means to achieving real independence and how independence can be good for us as a nation.
For a start we can take back control of our country and our oilfields (like East Timor).
The world is in trouble because of its reliance on oil and fossil fuels. Carbon dioxide from their use is forcing the atmosphere to get hotter. As much as I’d like it to be otherwise there is going to be a problem, a very big problem. Sarawak’s wealth is in its biodiversity and the living systems that make things like the water keep flowing and the land able to provide.