A PBB Assembly women Fatimah claim that 7 days is enough for the candidates to campaign in the coming state elections. Others disagreed with her-including the EC which stick to 10 days campaign period. So can we see if Fatimah will only campaign for 7 days in this coming state elections? But then is the 10 days enough?Both sides in the elections have by all intent and purposes started their campaigns-even though the official campaign period only start from Apr 6th, which is next Wed. If EC’s job is to base its election administration on the consensus of the contending parties then why is it not announce a longer campaign period which all sides practically are demanding? Is the purpose to keep a short official campaign period to stop the Opposition parties to campaign while giving free reign to the ruling BN?
Archive for March 30th, 2011
Last night when Dr Jeniri Amir of Unimas speak about growing support of Sibu voters for Pakatan in Astro Awani talk show program `Focus on Sarawak’ the unthinkable thing of the swanky studio of Awani happened: the telephone line broke off and Dr Jeniri was never given another chance to continue his answers to a panel accompanying the presenter! It was as though there was some minder overseeing the program if the invited speaker step out of line! Another Dayak academic put in very diplomatic language of Dayaks being left out in employment opportunities at state and federal agencies his complaint was ignored. He went as far as to suggest that the coming state election is a referendum on the unspoken policy to keep Dayaks out of State and Federal employment opportunities.
The Transparency International president Paul Low refuted defacto Law Minister Nazri’s assertion in Parliament that giving cash and kind during election is not corruption. He reportedly draw the line on giving of cash as inducement for votes-which it consider a crime. Other than that all other pledges are electoral promises-which are also indulge in by the non-ruling parties and thus does not constitute a legal offense despite that it could be a moral problem. This position is refuted by Bersih’s spokeperson Ambiga who consider all inducement of votes to fall under the Election Offenses Act. Now; where is the line if we adopt not just a legal perspective -but also a standard from free and fair perspective?
30th March 2011
CFM MEDIA STATEMENT
PROTECT AND DEFEND CHRISTIANS’ RIGHT TO USE THE ALKITAB
We are grateful to Almighty God for bringing together Christian leaders from across churches in Semenanjung, Sabah and Sarawak to address the current controversy surrounding the impounding of Bahasa Malaysia Bibles, the Alkitab, at Port Klang and Kuching. This decision weighs heavily on us because of the implications not only for Christians but for all Malaysians.
We are united in our reaffirmation of the freedom of religion and worship. Therefore, our position is that there should be no restrictions, proscriptions or prohibitions whatsoever on the Bible or the use of the language of our choice in the practice of our religion, as it was in the days before and after the formation of Malaysia.